PSU Sex Abuse Scandal
- Penn State Bowl Ban Lifted
- Freeh must show why Spanier suit should be moved
- Debate continues over PSU consent decree
- Trustees approve resolution to continue with consent decree
- After heated meeting, PSU board votes to continue with sanctions
- PSU still awaiting word on federal investigation regarding Clery Act
- Penn State trustees to discuss lawsuit status
- Penn St. trustees seek meeting over NCAA sanctions
- State, NCAA get delay for talks in Penn State suit
- New Sandusky defense attorney plans appeal
- PSU trustee election lawsuit argument heard in Centre Co. court
- 5 Pa. reps ask NCAA to halt Penn State sanctions
- Barbour next PSU Athletic Director
- Reports: Penn State to name new AD Saturday
- Freeh turning to federal court in defamation lawsuit
- PSU alumnus intends to sue school, trustees over losing BOT election
- PSU joins NCAA in requesting court documents stay sealed
- Judge approves transfer of more Second Mile assets
- Pa. court won't speed up Spanier vs. Freeh lawsuit
- Kane report sheds light on child abuse reporting recommendations
- Corbett: I've never condemned Paterno, 'never will'
- Kane investigation tops $180K, reveals no political motivation
- AG Kane releases report on Sandusky investigation
- Sandusky's wife refutes Attorney General's report
- Report: Missteps, delays abundant in Sandusky investigation
- Report to be released on Sandusky abuse investigation
- AG plans Monday release of Sandusky case review
- Penn State AD Joyner announces retirement
- Corbett says he read Sandusky investigation report
- Senate committee approves PSU BOT reform legislation
- PSU BOT reform legislation vote expected Tuesday
- Judge sets Jan. trial in suit over Penn State fine
- Gov. Corbett meets with investigator over Sandusky case
- Freeh seeks speedy trial on PSU defamation claims
- No rulings in Paterno vs. NCAA hearing
- Paterno family continues fight for more documents in case vs. NCAA
- Erickson reflects on time spent as PSU President
- Penn State announces board of trustee voting results
- PSU BOT voting appears to be down after recording breaking years
- NCAA: Paterno sanctions lawsuit 'ignores reality'
- Rominger files response about leaked court docs, case is sealed
- Rominger responds to court over Sandusky media leaks, would want his filings sealed
- Franklin's involvement in Vanderbilt rape case questioned
- Corbett signs 4 more child-abuse prevention bills
- Freeh gets expedited appeal in Spanier lawsuit
- Court seeks to examine Penn St.-NCAA agreement
- PSU Clery Act investigation remains ongoing
- PA Supreme Court won't hear Sandusky appeal
- Spanier asks federal court to halt criminal case
- PSU nixed plan to tribute Paterno after his death
- Freeh appeals ruling that delayed Spanier lawsuit
- Low support in state House for PSU BOT changes
- Documents released showing how Freeh was hired for PSU report
- Delay of Spanier's defamation suit lawsuit affirmed
- Former Sandusky lawyer surrenders law license
- Group continues to push for more PSU records to be released
- Former Sandusky attorney being investigated
- Centre Co. seeing spike in abuse case reports in recent week
- Pa. Attorney General's Sandusky case costs nearing $100K
- Former PSU admins again asking for cases to be dismissed
- Penn State expected to name new president today
- AG Kane: Internal review of Sandusky case delayed
- Pa. Court denies Sandusky attorney's appeal
- Judge rules Baldwin testimony may be permissible against 3 PSU ex-administrators
- Paterno lawsuit against NCAA will move forward
- Former PSU president seeks delay in defamation suit against Louis Freeh
- Centre Co. experts weigh in on Lynn case's impact on accused Penn State official's future
- Documentary about State College after Sandusky scandal premieres
- Baldwin testimony quashed; Curley, Schultz, Spanier hearing wraps up early
- Pa. House advances child-abuse reforms
- State details case against ex-PSU president
- Possible changes proposed to PSU sanctions
- Victim 9 sues Sandusky, PSU
- State senators propose PSU Board of Trustee changes
- Expenses for PSU scandal near $52 million
- AG argues against court hearing Sandusky appeal
- Judge sets hearing date for Spanier vs. Freeh case
- Search for next PSU president extended
- Jerry Sandusky lawyers file notice of another appeal
- PSU board calls off special meeting
- Paterno family lawsuit vs. NCAA goes before judge
- Penn State: 26 people get $59.7M over Sandusky
- Sen. denied request to intervene in NCAA suit
- Lawyers: 19 Sandusky victims settle with Penn St.
- Pa. appeals court: No new trial for Sandusky
- NCAA to restore Penn State football scholarships
- PSU student files lawsuit against police
- Borrowing, protest to mark Penn State meeting
- Sandusky's 1st appeal hearing set for Tuesday
- Former prosecutor says he doesn't think Paterno aided in cover-up
- Changes made to Jerry Sandusky appeal hearing
- PA Superior Court panel to hear Jerry Sandusky appeal
- 3 former PSU administrators to face trial
- McQueary: Paterno said Old Main 'screwed up'
- Testimony: Public information office 'in the dark' about Sandusky investigation
- Penn State community wants answers from administrator hearing
- Freeh stands behind findings in new interview
- Spanier denied access to some evidence
- 6 News Investigation: PSU trustee works to clear criminal record
- Judge approves Matt Sandusky, family name change, documents possibly to be sealed
- Judge to seal Sandusky family request for name change
- Paterno statue removal anniversary
- Paterno statue removal anniversary
Paterno lawsuit against NCAA will move forward
Updated: Wednesday, January 8 2014, 11:42 AM EST
By: WJAC Web Staff and The Associated Press
BELLEFONTE, Pa. -- Some claims made by the Joe Paterno family and Penn State University supporters in a lawsuit against the NCAA can proceed to the next phase in court, a judge has ruled.
Senior Judge John Leete, of Potter County, issued his opinion Tuesday, saying that some parts of the legal battle between the Paternos and the NCAA can move to the discovery phase.
Paterno family lawyer Wick Sollers said Leete’s ruling was a “significant victory” for the case, saying that some of the most critical claims in the lawsuit against the NCAA will move forward.
Leete’s decision allows both parties to continue with compiling and filing for discovery items, like subpoenaing documents and dispositions of people they think will be helpful to their cases.
The lawsuit includes family members of former Nittany Lion’s football head coach Joe Paterno, Penn State trustees and former football players and coaches, who are in part trying to have the sanctions imposed by the NCAA in July 2012 overturned.
The ruling would require the NCAA to share background information about the sanctions that were imposed. NCAA President Mark Emmert and former NCAA director Ed Ray are named as defendants in the lawsuit.
Leete dismissed breach of contract claims related to the case, saying that Penn State University must become involved in the lawsuit in order for parts of the lawsuit to proceed. Leete gave PSU 30 days to join the lawsuit, saying the school is an “indispensable party” in the lawsuit.
The NCAA imposed the sanctions on the school following the issuance of the Freeh Report, the internal investigation Penn State paid for and was complied by former FBI Director Louis Freeh and his company.
NCAA sanctions against the school included a $60 million fine, loss of football scholarships, a four-year bowl ban and the vacating of more than 100 victories. The NCAA did change direction on the scholarship reductions, allowing some scholarship to be reinstated over the course of several years.
On Twitter Tuesday afternoon, two of Joe Paterno’s sons reacted to Leete’s decision.
“Ladies and Gentleman – the court just gave us Discovery in Paterno vs. NCAA. Here we go,” Scott Paterno tweeted. “The court left some claims alone, kicked others, replead others – bottom line the case moves forward. Bring it on.”
“There are some things in life you fight for to your last breath if need be. Penn State & the truth are worth fight for,” Jay Paterno tweeted.
There was no date given for when discovery materials would be required to be filed with the court.